GPS Tracking Is a "Search" - confusion over law and freedoms
CDT joined in a "friend of the court" brief filed at the U.S. Supreme Court in what could be one of the major Fourth Amendment cases of the decade, U.S. v. Jones, which poses the question of whether the police can plant a GPS device on a person's car for 24/7 tracking without judicial oversight. The brief says: The issue before the Court in this case is not whether GPS tracking ever may be used by the government. Rather, it is whether the government must obtain a warrant in order to employ this technology. CDT's brief was filed jointly with our frequent partner in Fourth Amendment cases, the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Several things make the brief special. First, it is also signed by four technologists, whose expertise lends special credibility to the brief. Moreover, one of the four is Roger Easton, often called the father of GPS for his groundbreaking work at the Naval Research Laboratory. The other three represent the current generation of experts