I am not sure if the word "Could" is a helpful word or not.
Yesterday I had a long debate with a security expert about digital footprints, privacy, data, security, value and risk. I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that "could", when used by the security and privacy profession, is used as a negative word that fuels fear, uncertainty and doubt. If you start from a premise that anything could happen, even in your wildest dreams than a statement that starts with "could" is all to often a specific state or reason why you should not do something. Security is surly a balance between usability and lockdown, in much the same way as freedom is a balance between open and frustration. "Could" raises the possibility of a scenario which is hard to deal with. "Could" is probable, but doesn't define risk or propensity. "Could" is a good consultancy business model if you want to buy every reason why innovation, creativity and invention are bad and ugly "Could" often is used with