Does Identiy define the edge of your network?

Image002

Assuming that “Identity,Trust and Privacy” fade [by fade I mean hard boundary (technical, permission, certificate) and soft boundary (time, relevance, reach)], is it useful to consider that your network [by which I mean consider the network in the widest possible sense: physical, six degrees, payment, access, codes, influence, reach, recommendation, LogIn, ID, FoF] edges should be defined by a propensity to risk. The lower risk desired the closer you need to be to the source. Is our frustration that those with the lowest risk have the highest authority and that I cannot enable my risk profile across my services?

Mobile Breakfast 29th June, London: Operators and OTT: The way forward @ChetanSharma

Mobile Breakfast Series, June 29th, 2012 Operators and OTT: The way forward

Image002

Venue: Wayra, Telefonica. Shropshire House, 11-20 Capper Street, London, WC1E 6JA

Registration: http://www.mobilebreakfastseries.com

Operator traditional revenue streams are under threat esp. voice and messaging. Access margins will continue to stay under pressure. OTT players are coming in fast and furious and it is not just the big ones like Google but also players like Whatsapp, Voxer, Viber and others. How do operators play in the new landscape – lessen the decline of their traditional revenues while investing in new areas that improve their overall margins and revenues. Do they play the role of an enabler, a utility player, or become the OTT player themselves? In a software-driven world, how do they stay nimble? On the flip side, what are some things that operators can provide to the OTT players that make them successful, take them to the market quickly and maintain a long-term healthy and mutually-beneficial partnership? Operators still generate 70% of the global mobile industry revenues, so they are an important part of the chain but how do they ensure they have an equally relevant share in the profits. The panel will discuss how operators and OTT players think about the challenges and the opportunities, the competition and the co-opetition.

Frank Meehan, Horizon Ventures

Frank Meehan is part of the successful Horizons VC team, representing Mr Li Ka-Shing's private investments. Horizons was an early investor in Skype and holds investments in Facebook, Spotify, Second Market, Waze, and SIRI before it was sold to Apple. Frank also founded INQ Mobile, a Hutchison Whampoa venture which won best handset at MWC 2009, and he is currently on the boards of Trapit, Tripboard, Tout, Summly, Magisto and the TOM Group.

James Finn, Director, Product Design, Telefonica Digital

James Finn currently works at the newly formed Telefonica Digital as the Director of Communication Product Design after a string of internal roles at Telefonica including Chief Fire Stoker @ The Lab, GM of Jajah for Europe and New Business Development at O2 UK. During this time he has launched several products within the Telefonica Footprint such as International Favourites (O2 UK), Global Friends (O2 DE), Social Call, Virtual International Numbers (Telefonica Spain), Calling Card App (O2 UK) and

O2 Connect (Telefonica Digital). Previous to O2 he has worked for a number of startups such as RingRing Media (Acquired by Amobee), Thumbplay (Acquired by ClearChannel), Zingy (Acquired by For-Side) and also spent a time at Ericsson running global sales for the Napster Mobile Product.

Andreas Bernstrröm, CEO, Rebtel

Andreas has overall responsibility for company strategy and direction. Andreas works to ensure that the business runs smoothly now and in the future.  Prior to Rebtel, Andreas has been COO of Taptu and of TradeDoubler, where he was responsible for 600+ employees and more than $500 million in revenues  Prior to that Andreas spent three years at Goldman Sachs.

Patrice Slupowski, VP, Digital Innovation, Orange FT Group.

Patrice Slupowski, VP Digital Innovation, is heading NExT.com, the innovation team of the NAC Division of the Orange FT group. The team runs projects on mobile, PC, TV and tablets like Orange actu revue, TVcheck,  Newsblend with a strong involvement on social networks, recommendation, social TV or personal data aggregation. He started in ticketing then development then founded Waptoo in 1999, (mobile services & QA) and sold the company to Lagardere in 2004. Patrice is a graduate in Information Science and Technology from Paris-Dauphine.

Chetan Sharma, President, Chetan Sharma Consulting (moderator)

Chetan Sharma is President of Chetan Sharma Consulting and is one of the leading strategists in the mobile industry. Executives from wireless companies around the world seek his accurate predictions, independent insights, and actionable recommendations. He has served as an advisor to senior executive management of several Fortune 100 companies in the wireless space and is probably the only industry strategist who has advised each of the top 6 global mobile data operators. Chetan is the author or co-author or editor of seven best-selling books on mobile and over 100 articles/papers related to mobile.

me and my shadow by tactical tech @Info_Activism

Image001

I was very excited when I saw this and then kind of worried when I saw the scare focussed graphics and alas it did not deliver for me. 

Just simply telling me what I told “map my Shadow” in a very poor table format was not impressive and the summary was just not informative. The shadow tracers kit has some useful tools but most of them are the scare the pants out of your without any real context.

However “Lost in Small Print” was cleaver.

Eurobarometer: Attitudes on Data Protection and Identity

Image001

monster of a report http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_359_en.pdf

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the results of the largest survey ever conducted regarding

citizen’s behaviours and attitudes concerning identity management, data protection

and privacy. It represents the attitudes and behaviours of Europeans on this subject.

The main findings of the survey are the following: 

 74% of the Europeans see disclosing personal information as an increasing

part of modern life. 

 Information considered as personal is, above all, financial information

(75%), medical information (74%), and national identity numbers or cards

and passports (73%).

 

 Social networking and sharing sites users are more likely to disclose their

name (79%), photo (51%) and nationality (47%). Online shoppers’  actual

online disclosure of personal information mainly involves their names (90%),

home addresses (89%), and mobile numbers (46%). 

 The most important reason for disclosure is to access an online service, for

both social networking and sharing site users (61%) and online shoppers

(79%).

 43% of Internet users say they have been asked for more personal

information than necessary when they proposed to obtain access to or use

an online service. 

 A majority of Europeans are concerned about the recording of their

behaviour via payment cards (54% vs. 38%), mobile phones (49% vs. 43%)

or mobile Internet (40% vs. 35%). 

 Almost six in ten Internet users usually read privacy statements (58%) and

the majority of those who read them adapt their behaviour on the Internet

(70%).

 Over half of Internet users are informed about the data collection conditions

and the further uses of their data when joining a social networking site or

registering for a service online (54%).

 Only one-third of Europeans are aware of the existence of a national public

authority responsible for protecting their rights regarding their personal data

(33%).

 Just over a quarter of social network users (26%) and even fewer online

shoppers (18%) feel in complete control. 

 Europeans use the following types of credentials: mostly credit cards and

bank cards (74%), national identity cards or residence permits (68%),

government entitlement cards (65%), or driving licences (63%). 34% of

respondents have an account they use on  the  Internet, such as email, or  for

social networking or commercial services.

 To protect their identity in daily  life, 62% of the Europeans give the

minimum required information. 

 To protect their identity on the Internet, the most usual strategies are

technical or procedural, like tools and strategies to limit unwanted emails

such as spam (42%), checking that the transaction is protected or the site

has a safety logo or label (40%), and using anti-spy software (39%).

 Authorities and institutions – including the European Commission and the

European Parliament (55%) – are trusted more than commercial companies.

 

 Less than one-third trust phone companies, mobile phone companies and

Internet service providers (32%); and just over one-fifth trust Internet

companies such as search engines,  social networking sites and e-mail

services (22%). 

 70% of Europeans are concerned that their personal data held by companies

may be used for a purpose other than that for which it was collected.

 Turning to Europeans’  own data handling, 28% are prepared to pay for

access to their personal information stored by public or private entities.

 As regards the "right to be forgotten", a clear majority of Europeans (75 %)

want to delete personal information on a website whenever they decide to do

so. 

 Even though a majority of European Internet users feel responsible

themselves for the safe handling of their personal data, almost all Europeans

are in favour of equal protection rights across the EU (90%).

 

 More than four in ten Europeans would prefer the European level of

administration for enforcing regulation (44%), while a somewhat smaller

number would prefer the national level (40%). 

When asked what type of regulation should be introduced to prevent

companies from using people’s personal data without their knowledge, most

Europeans think that such companies  should be fined (51%), banned from

using such data in the future (40%), or compelled to compensate the victims

(39%).

 A majority believe that their personal data would be better protected in large

companies if these companies were obliged to have a Data Protection Officer

(88%).

 Europeans’ opinions are divided with respect to the circumstances under

which the police should have access to personal data. In contrast, they

almost all agree that minors should  be protected from (95%) and warned

against the disclosure of  personal data (96%); and a vast majority are in

favour of the special protection of genetic data (88%).

Speaking on Personal Data: Life Management Platforms with @docsearls @drummondreed @windley @scottldavid #eic12

Image002

Looking forward to http://www.id-conf.com/eic2012  this week and discussing/ debating with

On the Life Management Platforms track, specifically “Giving Individuals Control and Knowledge of their Personal Information held by Others - What are the Consequences?

I will be at London Telco-OTT & Future of Voice workshops April 26-27 with @disruptivedean @martingeddes

Fragmentation

London Telco-OTT & Future of Voice workshops April 26-27

The first day is Future of Voice (more details from Martin can be found here.)  Day 2 is a  workshop specifically on Telco-OTT services.   There's a lot of rhetoric about how operators should "deal with OTT", but Dean is the only person to publish and speak specifically about how operators can and should become OTT players themselves Dean’s recent report  where he examines more than 100 different telco Internet-based offers, spanning a wide variety of service segments, and have advised operators around the world on opportunities and risks.


 The cost per delegate is £700 for one day, or £1000 for both days, plus 20% UK VAT. Registration http://www.amiando.com/FoV5.html

 

Future of Voice
Day 1 (April 26th) is an evolution of our previous workshop format on the evolution of telephony, voice services, new communications business models and hot topics around personal connectivity and interaction. It spans everything from underlying psychology (why do people make phone calls? what are the fundamental drivers that determine why we want to connect with each other?) to the evolving nature of voice "beyond the phone call". It considers concepts such as:

-          Peak Telephone

-          Free, Freemium and Less-than-Free business models

-          Why "voice" and "telephony" are not the same thing

-          Personal portfolios of voice & messaging

-          The slow death of standards & interoperability

-          VoLTE & RCS / RCSe (including thoughts on Joyn)

-          APIs and developer initiatives around VoIP & communications

-          "Cloud voice"

-          Operator innovation around voice

-          Thoughts on regulation, interconnect & fixed VoIP


Telco-OTT strategies & services
Day 2 (April 27th) is the first public workshop on Telco-OTT services. I'll cover some of the key themes explored in my recent report, plus additional insights gleaned in recent months of engagement with various clients, plus meetings at MWC and other events. It will span fixed and mobile OTT services, from mobile VoIP to online video, and from femtocells to cloud SaaS.

-          History of Telco-OTT (there's a surprising amount!)

-          The import / export model for telcos

-          Death of Ubiquity: Why OTT is inevitable for operators

-          Segmentation of Telco-OTT (comms, content, cloud, connectivity)

-          Technology enablers & platforms

-          Specific analysis of Telco-OTT VoIP & messaging services

-          Partnering with Internet-OTT players vs. developing own-brand operator services

-          Build vs. buy vs. acquire

-          Case studies - success, failure & innovation

-          Organisational & operational challenges for telco-OTT

-          Implications for investors, regulators & industry bodies

-          Round-up of vendors and operators' activities on Telco-OTT